Read the case given below and answer the questions given at the end.

CASE STUDY-2:

Following is the excerpt from an interview of Adi B.Godrej, Chairman, Godrej Group.

Q. "Some people who worked with Godrej a few years back and have since left, remember the Group as a great place to get started but lacking a sieve to subsequently separate the performers from the laggards. Has this worried you?"

A: "We have changed a lot since. I would agree with their evaluation, five to six years ago. That is why I said that whilst we have been human resource development oriented, we need to become much more so. We have done a lot of positive work in that direction in the last couple of years and will do more in the next three years.

But remember, this happens in all good companies. In which good company do people not leave at that stage? After all, the room at the top is always less than at the bottom. So people have to leave. The challenge is, that our not-so-good performers should leave and not our very good performers.

Questions:

1. What are the challenges the group faces if their managers wanted to retain the 'good performers' and allow 'not-so-goodperformers' to leave?
2. Advise effective solutions for achieving Mr.Godrej's goal?